Can Susan sue Macy's for breach of contract regarding her bonus?

To determine whether Susan can sue Macy's for breach of contract regarding her bonus, it's important to understand the nature of contracts and what constitutes a binding agreement. In this context, the correct response highlights that there was no contractual obligation, which is a fundamental requirement for any breach of contract claim.

For a breach of contract to occur, there must be an enforceable agreement that clearly outlines the terms and conditions that both parties must adhere to. If Macy's did not formally establish a contractual agreement regarding the payment of bonuses—meaning there were no specific terms concluding that Susan was entitled to a bonus—then Susan lacks the necessary grounds to claim breach of contract. This situation emphasizes the principle that not every expectation or belief about compensation constitutes a legal obligation; there must be clear, mutual agreement.

In contrast, the other options suggest scenarios that either misconstrue the nature of contractual relationships or assume conditions that may not apply (such as loyalty as a basis for legal claims or the idea that bonuses, by default, must be provided without explicit agreement). Without a legally binding contract, Susan does not have the right to sue Macy's for any alleged breach regarding her bonus.