What is the rule called that prohibits the use of tainted evidence obtained from unlawful searches?

The Exclusionary Rule is a legal principle that dictates that any evidence obtained through unlawful searches or seizures cannot be used in a court of law. This rule is designed to uphold the constitutional rights of individuals by deterring law enforcement from engaging in unconstitutional practices. It stems from the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution, which protects citizens against unreasonable searches and seizures.

By excluding tainted evidence, the rule ensures that law enforcement adheres to legal standards during investigations, thus promoting justice and integrity within the legal system. If evidence is collected without a proper warrant, probable cause, or in violation of an individual's rights, it is deemed inadmissible in court. This prevents the prosecution from benefiting from potentially flawed or illegal actions taken by law enforcement.

The other rules mentioned, such as the Miranda Rule, refer to the rights of individuals during police interrogations, while the Due Process Rule encompasses broader constitutional protections during legal proceedings. The Probable Cause Rule relates to the requirement law enforcement must meet to obtain a warrant or make an arrest, but does not address the admissibility of evidence in the same way that the Exclusionary Rule does. Thus, the Exclusionary Rule specifically pertains to the inadmissibility of tainted evidence, making it the correct