What legal claim can Mom assert if she was misled by Alice regarding the deed?

In the scenario where Mom was misled by Alice regarding the deed, the legal claim that best fits this situation is based on the concept of misrepresentation. This occurs when one party makes false statements that induce another party to enter into a contract or agreement.

Misrepresentation specifically addresses situations where one party, in this case, Alice, has provided false information or omitted critical information that leads the other party, Mom, to make decisions she otherwise would not have made. For Mom to successfully assert a claim, she would need to demonstrate that Alice knowingly made a false statement or did so with reckless disregard for the truth, and that this misrepresentation caused Mom harm or loss.

The option focused on fraudulent activities may suggest a more deliberate or deceitful intention behind the misrepresentation, which is a separate legal claim that could apply if the nature of Alice's actions rose to that level of deceit. However, misrepresentation as a claim can address situations where a party has been led to believe something that was not true, regardless of the intent behind the misleading statements.

Therefore, while fraudulent activities could potentially lead to a legal action, the more fitting claim in this context is misrepresentation, as it encapsulates the act of misleading Mom regarding the deed without necessarily proving the