What term describes evidence obtained through illegal search and seizure?

The term that describes evidence obtained through illegal search and seizure is "tainted evidence." This concept plays an important role in the legal system, particularly in relation to the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures. When evidence is obtained in violation of a person's constitutional rights, it is considered tainted and is not admissible in court.

Tainted evidence undermines the integrity of the judicial process, as allowing such evidence could encourage law enforcement to disregard the legality of their search practices. This leads to the exclusionary rule, which prohibits the use of tainted evidence in legal proceedings to deter police misconduct.

In contrast, admissible evidence refers to evidence that is allowed to be presented in court and meets all legal standards. Hearsay evidence involves statements made outside of court that are presented to prove the truth of the matter asserted, while corroborated evidence pertains to evidence that supports or confirms the credibility of other evidence. These terms represent different aspects of legal evidence and do not specifically relate to the illegality of how the evidence was obtained.