What test is used to review government regulations that classify individuals based on race?

The correct approach to review government regulations that classify individuals based on race is known as Strict Scrutiny. This is the most rigorous standard of judicial review applied by courts when evaluating laws that may infringe upon fundamental rights or create classifications that are based on inherently suspect characteristics, such as race.

Under the Strict Scrutiny standard, the government must demonstrate that the regulation serves a compelling governmental interest and that the law is narrowly tailored to achieve that interest using the least restrictive means available. This ensures a high level of protection for individuals against the potential for discrimination and promotes equal treatment under the law.

In contrast, other scrutiny levels such as Minimum Scrutiny (or Rational Basis Test) and Intermediate Scrutiny are applied in different contexts. For instance, the Rational Basis Test is used for laws that deal with classifications based on factors such as age or economic status, where the burden of proof is much lower for the government. Similarly, Intermediate Scrutiny is used primarily for cases involving gender or legitimacy, requiring a substantial governmental interest but not as strict as that required under Strict Scrutiny.

Therefore, when it comes to cases involving race, the application of Strict Scrutiny reflects the legal system's commitment to protecting against racial discrimination and upholding the principles of equality and justice