What type of activities assigned to independent contractors create strict liability for principals?

The correct choice is inherently dangerous activities, as these are the types of activities that can impose strict liability on principals when assigned to independent contractors. Strict liability suggests that a party can be held responsible for damages or harm caused by certain activities, regardless of fault or negligence.

When a principal hires an independent contractor to perform work that is inherently dangerous, such as using explosives or handling hazardous materials, the principal can still be held liable for any injuries or damages that result from those activities. This legal principle is put in place to encourage safety and ensure that those who engage in particularly risky activities are held accountable for potential harm inflicted upon others, regardless of whether the principal was directly involved or negligent.

In contrast, inherently safe activities do not present the same level of risk and therefore do not create strict liability for principals. Fully disclosed situations do not inherently generate liability because they involve transparency regarding the nature of the activities and relationships involved, while non-injury related activities do not typically entail liability concerns since they do not inflict harm. Thus, the focus on inherently dangerous activities underscores the legal principles that aim to safeguard public safety by placing responsibility on those who deal with higher risks.