Which of the following products would likely fall under strict liability?

Strict liability pertains to situations where a party can be held responsible for damages or harm caused by a product regardless of whether negligence was proven or not. This legal doctrine is typically applied to inherently dangerous activities or defective products.

In the context of the choices provided, toys lacking safety warnings fit this category well. They can be considered defective if they do not provide adequate safety information, leading to potential harm to users, particularly children who are the primary consumers of toys. As such, manufacturers can be held strictly liable because consumers expect such products to be safe and free of defects.

On the other hand, newspaper articles generally fall under freedom of speech and press protections, and liability for content is typically assessed under different legal standards, such as defamation, rather than strict liability. Food items that are properly stored do not pose a risk of defect or harm if handled correctly, and therefore would not usually fall under strict liability. Regulated pharmaceuticals may involve a complex interplay of liability standards, including negligence and regulatory compliance, rather than straightforward strict liability, although they can certainly still be subject to strict liability under certain circumstances.